Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Although random intercept (RI) multilevel models (MLMs) are commonly used, the inclusion of random slopes, when warranted, is necessary to avoid Type I errors for variables that randomly vary by group. However, instead of explicitly modeling the random slope, an alternative approach could be to use a more parsimonious RI model together with cluster-robust standard errors (CRSEs). Although the traditionally used CRSEs (CR0) can still underestimate standard errors when only a few clusters are present, we investigate a variant (i.e., the CR2) that has been shown to be effective with a limited number of clusters. Results of a Monte Carlo simulation show that using a RI model together with the CR2 can effectively account for violations of homoscedasticity, resulting in acceptable coverage probability rates for all conditions tested. However, when used with a limited number of clusters, a properly specified random slope model has more power to detect effects for level-2 predictors and cross-level interaction (CLI) terms.
Huang et al. (Wed,) studied this question.