Key result
Istaroxime increases LVEF by ~1.3% vs placebo in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of istaroxime in patients with heart failure.
Does istaroxime improve hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters in patients with acute heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=211)
Does istaroxime improve hemodynamic and echocardiographic parameters in patients with acute heart failure?
Mean Difference: 1.26 (95% CI 0.91–1.62)
p-value: p=0.001
Istaroxime infusion in acute heart failure significantly improves short-term cardiac function and hemodynamics but is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events.
Istaroxime modestly raises LVEF; extends preliminary data but needs larger outcome trials before practice change.
The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a search was conducted on the EMBASE and Medline databases to identify articles related to the safety and efficacy of istaroxime in patients with heart failure. The search covered the period from inception to May 31st, 2023, without any restrictions on the year of publication. The search strategy utilized relevant terms such as "istaroxime," "heart failure", "efficacy," and other related terms, along with their corresponding Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms. The outcomes assessed in this meta-analysis included the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), E to A ratio (a marker of left ventricle function), cardiac index in L/min/m2, systolic blood pressure (SBP) in mmHg, left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) in ml, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVDSV) in ml. For safety analysis, gastrointestinal events and cardiovascular events were assessed. A total of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this meta-analysis encompassing 211 patients with heart failure. Pooled analysis showed that istaroxime was effective in increasing LVEF (MD: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.91 to 1.62, p-value: 0.001), reducing E to A ratio (MD: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.19, p-value: 0.001), increasing cardiac index (MD: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.25, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVESV (MD: -11.84, 95% CI: -13.91 to -9.78, p-value: 0.001), reducing LVEDV (MD: -12.25, 95% CI: -14.63 to -9.87, p-value: 0.001) and increasing SBP (MD: 8.41, 95% CI: 5.23 to 11.60, p-value: 0.001) compared to the placebo group. However, risk of gastrointestinal events was significantly higher in patients receiving istaroxime compared to the placebo group (RR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.53 to 4.57, p-value: 0.0005). These findings support the enhancement of heart function with istaroxime administration, aligning with previous clinical and experimental evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2023) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute Heart Failure (n=211). Istaroxime vs. Placebo was evaluated on Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD 1.26, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.62, p=0.001). Istaroxime significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 1.26) compared to placebo in patients with acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: