Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates economic advantages in power flow control with quick corrective actions after contingencies, implying better system reliability.
This paper proposes an approach for computing an optimal power flow jointly with local control laws for quickly-controllable grid assets that enable fast corrective actions after contingencies. While existing corrective security-constrained optimal power flow approaches rely on communication in the post-contingency phase, introducing delays, the proposed control scheme can react almost immediately after contingencies and thus allows for higher line loadings in normal operation. A novel min-max optimization approach based on the DC power flow model minimizes operating costs in the default case while ensuring feasibility even under the worst-case contingency, taking into account the locally controlled corrective actions. The resulting problem is solved via a column-and-constraint generation algorithm. Case studies on the modified IEEE 39-bus system and 118-bus system with additional high-voltage DC lines as quickly-controllable grid assets demonstrate the computational feasibility and economic advantages of the proposed approach. Compared to preventive and traditional corrective dispatch, this approach reduces costs for the 39-bus system by 14 % and 4 %, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sax et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: