Although the Ch'ing period is generally regarded as one of the better studied and understood periods of Chinese history, the existing fund of our knowledge is actually far from adequate. A systematic discussion of the significance of the entire period from 1644 to 1912 would require a large number of articles, monographs, and fresh syntheses. Since the purpose of this paper is merely to stimulate further discussion and research, I hope to be excused for making a few highly tentative generalizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P.P.S. Ho (1967) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: