Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The interaction of sulfur, ZnO, stearic acid, and the three sulfenamide accelerators N ‐cyclohexylbenzothiazole sulfenamide (CBS), 2‐(4‐morpholinothio) benzothiazole (MOR), and 2‐ t ‐butylaminobenzothiazole sulfenamide (TBBS) were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry in the absence of rubber. In the presence of sulfur, the same product spectrum is formed as in its absence, but at lower temperatures. Thus, CBS gives N ‐cyclohexylamino‐2‐benzothiazole polysulfides (CBP), 2‐bisbenzothiazole‐2,2′‐disulfide (MBTS), 2‐bisbenzothiazole‐2,2′‐polysulfides (MBTP), and 2‐bisbenzothiazole‐2,2′‐monosulfide (MBTP), 2‐mercaptobenzothiazole (MBT), and 2‐ N ‐cyclohexylaminobenzothiazole (CB). In the presence of sulfur, the amount of polysulfides formed initially is higher but the polysulfides are unstable, and on prolonged heating, only MBT and CB remain. MOR and TBBS form analogous product spectra. The sulfenamides do not react with ZnO or zinc stearate. The MBT–amine complex prevents MBT, formed on decomposition, from reacting to give zinc mercaptobenzothiazole (ZHBT). Reaction mechanisms are proposed to account for the formation of the products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gradwell et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: