Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of the existing research concerning the use and effects of AR in patient education. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines four electronic databases were systematically searched. INCLUSION CRITERIA: empirical studies using any type of AR intervention in patient education across all medical specialties. Quality assessment of the retrieved literature was carried out. RESULTS: Ten papers, comprising 788 patients, were identified and included (Randomized controlled trial (RCT)(n = 3), non-randomized controlled trial (n = 3), before-and-after study (n = 3), and qualitative survey (n = 1)). Retrieved literature showed itself to be highly heterogeneous. The studied population included patients suffering from a diverse spectrum of chronic diseases (e.g., prostate cancer, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy). Quantitative results indicated that the use of AR had a positive effect on knowledge retention and patient satisfaction. Qualitative findings suggested that patients liked the technology and felt comfortable with its use for educational purposes. The quality of the retrieved results was shown to be moderate to low. CONCLUSION: The limited evidence of this topic suggests the possible potential of AR in patient education. PRACTICE IMPLICATION: More research, using high-quality study designs and more evidence-based interventions, is needed to fully appreciate the value of AR on patient education.
Urlings et al. (Thu,) studied this question.