The purpose of this study was to examine the quality of quantitative articles published in the Journal of Counseling & Development . Quality concerns arose in regard to omissions of psychometric information of instruments, effect sizes, and statistical power. Type VI and II errors were found. Strengths included stated research questions and appropriateness of analyses. Implications of these results are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wester et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: