Admissible Transitions in AI-Augmented Leadership introduces PADC-CAS/SES as a transition-governance framework for AI-supported decision support. Rather than focusing solely on AI output quality, the paper examines the conditions under which AI-generated material may legitimately acquire organisational status as reliance, judgment, or action. It proposes a minimal guarded-transition record based on Surface, Remainder, Role, and Marked Transition, and outlines a staged empirical research agenda comparing documented professional practice, unguarded AI support, neutral review controls, and PADC-guarded workflows. The framework is presented as a micro-procedural complement to broader AI governance approaches, grounded in the HSRT Core.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henric T. Böhm (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: