Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates efficient Bayesian inference in simulated LISA data, indicating significant computational savings.
The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is due to launch in the mid-2030s. A key challenge for LISA data analysis is efficient Bayesian inference with parametrised gravitational-wave models, particularly for early inspirals of low- and intermediate-mass black-hole binaries, where time series can contain ~ 10⁸ ∼ 10 8 – 10⁹ 10 9 samples and naive likelihood evaluations become prohibitively expensive. We present a time-domain likelihood-approximation scheme for such signals. The method retains a small subset of samples and defines a modified noise-weighted inner product on this subset that closely reproduces the original inner product on the waveform manifold. Because this alters the effective noise model, the scheme is intended for analysis of simulated, rather than real LISA data. In our examples, the resulting posteriors closely agree with those obtained using much denser sampling, while retaining only 10³ 10 3 – 10⁴ 10 4 samples. The computational cost scales linearly with the number of retained samples Nₛ N s , so the speed-up is roughly Nf/Nₛ N f / N s , where Nf N f is the original data length; for realistic LISA-like datasets with Nf~ 10⁸ N f ∼ 10 8 – 10⁹ 10 9 this would correspond to gains of order 10⁴ 10 4 – 10⁶ 10 6 over straightforward frequency-domain likelihood evaluations of the full dataset, although a small number of additional runs is required to verify convergence. The time-domain formulation is particularly convenient for modelling effects naturally expressed through modified time evolution, such as those induced by non-trivial astrophysical environments or additional dynamical fields in beyond-GR theories. This paper provides the theoretical basis for the software package .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jethro Linley (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: