Key result
NOACs linked to ~15% lower bleeding risk vs. VKAs in newly diagnosed AF.
Why the study?
Lower risks of death and bleeding with NOACs were reported in trial meta-analyses, but whether these findings hold in real-world practice was uncertain.
Do NOACs reduce bleeding and mortality compared to VKAs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=52,032)
Yes
Do NOACs reduce bleeding and mortality compared to VKAs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.85 (95% CI 0.73–0.98)
In a real-world, global registry, NOACs were associated with significantly lower risks of bleeding and mortality compared to VKAs in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.
NOACs were associated with lower bleeding in new AF; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
In atrial fibrillation (AF), lower risks of death and bleeding with non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) were reported in meta-analyses of controlled trials, but whether these findings hold true in real-world practice remains uncertain. Risks of bleeding and death were assessed in 52 032 patients with newly diagnosed AF enrolled in GARFIELD-AF (Global Anticoagulant Registry in the FIELD-Atrial Fibrillation), a worldwide prospective registry. Baseline treatment was vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) with or without antiplatelet (AP) agents (VKA ± AP) (20 151; 39.3%), NOACs ± AP agents (14 103; 27.5%), AP agents only (10 748; 21.0%), or no antithrombotics (6219; 12.1%). One-year follow-up event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of minor, clinically relevant nonmajor (CRNM), and major bleedings were 2.29 (2.16-2.43), 1.10 (1.01-1.20), and 1.31 (1.21-1.41) per 100 patient-years, respectively. Bleeding risk was lower with NOACs than VKAs for any bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]), 0.85 [0.73-0.98]) or major bleeding (0.79 [0.60-1.04]). Compared with no bleeding, the risk of death was higher with minor bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.53 [1.07-2.19]), CRNM bleeding (aHR, 2.59 [1.80-3.73]), and major bleeding (aHR, 8.24 [6.76-10.04]). The all-cause mortality rate was lower with NOACs than with VKAs (aHR, 0.73 [0.62-0.85]). Forty-five percent (114) of all deaths occurred within 30 days, and 40% of these were from intracranial/intraspinal hemorrhage (ICH). The rates of any bleeding and all-cause death were lower with NOACs than with VKAs. Major bleeding was associated with the highest risk of death. CRNM bleeding and minor bleeding were associated with a higher risk of death compared to no bleeding. Death within 30 days after a major bleed was most frequently related to ICH. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01090362.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassand et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation (n=52,032). Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Any bleeding (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Non-vitamin-K oral anticoagulants were associated with a 15% lower risk of any bleeding (HR 0.85) compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: