Key result
ICI-monotherapy showed no significant difference in cardiovascular toxicities compared to combination-ICI therapy (1.32% vs 0.86%; RR -0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09).
Why the study?
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly associated with fatal cardiovascular toxicities, prompting a need to determine their incidence when used as sole anti-cancer therapy.
Does immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy compared to combination therapy, or PD1/PDL1 compared to CTLA4 inhibitors, affect the incidence of cardiovascular toxicities in cancer patients?
Meta-Analysis (n=11,207)
Does immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy compared to combination therapy, or PD1/PDL1 compared to CTLA4 inhibitors, affect the incidence of cardiovascular toxicities in cancer patients?
Immune checkpoint inhibitor-mediated cardiovascular toxicities are rare (1.30% incidence) with no significant difference in risk between monotherapy versus combination therapy or between PD1/PDL1 versus CTLA4 inhibitors.
ICI-mediated CVTs, though infrequent, carry high fatality risk; warrants surveillance protocols while leaving prevention and risk stratification open for prospective study.
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a novel class of anti-cancer therapy becoming increasingly associated with fatal cardiovascular toxicities (CVTs). The aim is to determine the incidence of CVTs in cohorts treated with ICIs as sole anti-cancer therapy. METHODS: A systematic literature search of scientific and medical databases was performed using PRISMA principles to identify relevant cohorts (PROSPERO registration CRD42021272470). Data for specific CVTs (pericardial disease, myocarditis, heart failure, arrhythmia, myocardial infarction/ischaemia and angina), CVT-related death and CV risk factors were extracted. Presence of CVTs in ICI-monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy, and programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1- (PD1/PDL1-) versus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4- (CTLA4-) inhibitor groups were dichotomised and meta-analysed using random-effect models. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies (11,207 patients) were identified, from which 146 CVTs were observed (incidence 1.30%). ICI-monotherapy led to more CVTs than combination therapy (119/9009; 1.32% vs. 18/2086; 0.86%). Across monotherapies, PD1/PDL1-inhibitors had lower incidence of CVTs compared to CTLA4-inhibitors (62/6950; 0.89% vs. 57/2059; 2.77%). Based on eight studies that were meta-analysed, no significant difference was observed comparing monotherapy versus combination-ICI therapy (RR-0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09) for all CVTs, or PD1/PDL1- to CTLA4-inhibitors (RR-0.27, 95% CI -2.06 to 1.53), for all CVTs including CVT-death. CV risk factors could not be attributed to an ICI group as data was population based rather than individual based. CONCLUSION: ICI-mediated CVTs are rare and potentially fatal. The role of CV risk factors in their development remains unclear.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malaty et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer (n=11,207). ICI-monotherapy vs. Combination-ICI therapy was evaluated on Cardiovascular toxicities (CVTs) (RR -0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09). ICI-monotherapy showed no significant difference in cardiovascular toxicities compared to combination-ICI therapy (1.32% vs 0.86%; RR -0.69, 95% CI -1.47 to 0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: