Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phenomenographic study identifies distinct conceptions of generative AI-mediated learning among undergraduates, suggesting strategies for deeper engagement.
This phenomenographic study identified six qualitatively distinct conceptions of GenAI-mediated learning among 15 Taiwanese undergraduates through interviews: (1) answer acquisition, (2) cognitive offloading, (3) future competency development, (4) question-driven exploration, (5) critical judgment engagement, and (6) collaborative creativity. Notably, “answer acquisition” emerged as the most common conception. These conceptions form a hierarchical spectrum, varying along dimensions of interaction mode with GenAI, perceived GenAI roles, and learner agency, and illustrate a progression from instrumental use toward collaborative knowledge construction. Understanding these variations could inform pedagogical strategies that encourage learners to move beyond surface-level engagement. Consequently, educators could promote deeper learning through critical reflection and collaborative co-construction, which are essential for supporting the responsible and transformative use of GenAI in educational contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mau et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: