Key result
Newly diagnosed AF after stroke thrombectomy is linked to ~155% higher odds of prolonged hospital stay.
Why the study?
The impact of pre-existing versus newly diagnosed AF on prognosis after endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke was uncertain.
Does newly diagnosed or pre-existing atrial fibrillation impact hospital length of stay, functional outcome, or mortality in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Cohort (n=138)
No
Does newly diagnosed or pre-existing atrial fibrillation impact hospital length of stay, functional outcome, or mortality in patients with ischaemic stroke undergoing endovascular thrombectomy?
Odds Ratio: 2.55 (95% CI 1.01–6.45)
p-value: p=0.048
In patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy for ischaemic stroke, newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation is associated with prolonged hospital stay but does not significantly impact functional prognosis or mortality compared to those without AF.
Newly detected AF signals higher post-EVT risk; leaves open whether timing affects prognosis or warrants specific interventions.
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major risk factor for ischaemic stroke (IS) and adverse long-term outcomes. The impact of pre-existing versus newly diagnosed AF on prognosis after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is uncertain. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with IS admitted to Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust between January 2016 and November 2023 who underwent EVT. Data were extracted from the Sentinel Stroke National Audit Programme and cross-referenced with hospital medical records. Patients were categorised into three groups based on AF status: no-AF, pre-existing AF, and new-AF. Outcomes included prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) [≥75th percentile], poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] ≥ 3 at discharge), and all-cause mortality (in-hospital, at 30-day, and at 6-month mortality). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analysis. Results: A total of 138 patients were included (mean ± SD for age: 67.9 ± 13.9 years; 45.7% female). Hospital LOS was longest in the new-AF group (median 35.0 days [IQR: 6.0–53.0]) compared with the pre-existing AF group (18.0 days [6.0–42.0]), and the no-AF group (7.0 days [3.0–28.0]), p = 0.024. In adjusted logistic regression, new-AF was significantly associated with prolonged LOS (OR = 2.55, 95%CI: 1.01–6.45, p = 0.048) but showed no association with poor functional prognosis (p = 0.851). Cox regression analysis showed that AF status was not associated with mortality (p = 0.325). Conclusions: Newly diagnosed AF after stroke is associated with prolonged hospitalisation despite comparable rates of successful EVT results but had no effect on functional prognosis or risk of death.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsheikh et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Ischaemic stroke (n=138). Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation vs. Pre-existing atrial fibrillation and no atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Prolonged hospital length of stay (≥75th percentile) (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.01-6.45, p=0.048). Newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation after stroke thrombectomy was associated with prolonged hospital length of stay (OR 2.55; 95% CI 1.01-6.45; p=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: