Explores legal challenges of Pillar Two's rules in jurisdictions, uncovering potential treaty violations.
Pillar Two’s “devilish logic” not only incentivizes countries to join the agreement but also diminishes the economic motivation for taxpayers to challenge the rules. This study explores whether this deterrent effect is based on violations of legal obligations enforceable against the involved jurisdictions. While no breaches of general international law were found, the study identifies potential violations of tax treaty provisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
PedroGuilhermeLindenberg Schoueri (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: