Methods paper proposes a framework for understanding and addressing conflict in healthcare teams, suggesting deeper intervention strategies.
Recurring conflict in healthcare teams frequently persists despite well‐intended interventions (Page et al. 2024; Mazzei et al. 2024). Dynamic systems theory helps to map how such recurrences reflect systemic feedback loops linking individual experience, behaviour, shared beliefs and organisational structures, supporting intervention design at a depth that matches the problem. This methods paper presents a visual framework and facilitation protocol for leadership sensemaking and intervention design. It combines (i) quadrant‐based multi‐perspective mapping (inner/outer × individual/collective), (ii) ecological scaling and (iii) temporal differentiation across events (t 0 ), patterns (t 1 ) and attractor‐like modes (t 2 ). The paper proposes four candidate stress‐attractor modes in healthcare teams— restricting , blaming , compensating and disengaging —grounded in research on threat‐rigidity, attribution, workarounds and employee silence. The framework is intended as a practical method to trace what maintains recurring conflict, align intervention depth with problem depth and identify early signs of both improvement and harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dominik Havsteen-Franklin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: