Qualitative case study examines how a Buddhist school adapts education to enhance equality in a diverse society, indicating potential methodologies for faith-based institutions.
How does Religious Education (RE) maintain viability and legitimacy in a superdiverse society? This article addresses this question through a qualitative case study of a Buddhist-sponsored secondary school in Hong Kong navigating simultaneous pressures of structural inequality and cultural superdiversity. Drawing on participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and content analysis, we examine how the school reframes its Buddhist Education through a ‘framing chain’, a causally linked sequence of reframing actions in which a subsequent framing process builds upon the conditions created by a preceding one. First, the school amplifies the Buddhist value of equality in its mission and admissions, broadening access to marginalised students as a strategic response to Hong Kong’s competitive educational market. This diversifies the student body, which necessitates a second reframing: transforming the Buddhist Education course into a ‘well-being programme’ that thins explicit Buddhist dogma while thickening universal values and pluralistic respect. Through these linked processes, Buddhist Education is reconceptualised as a ‘flexible value carrier’ which is capable of embracing a multifaceted array of values to facilitate inclusive schooling in a superdiverse school context. This article contributes to broader understandings of how faith-based institutions adapt RE to address inequality and diversity in pluralistic societies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: