Quasi-experimental study shows anti-involution training improves critical thinking in dental healthcare workers, suggesting personalized strategies for education.
This study evaluates changes in critical thinking among dental healthcare workers after anti-involution training (AIT) and identifies key predictors of training effectiveness. A pre-post quasi-experimental design was conducted with 91 participants. Critical thinking was assessed using the CTDI-CV scale. Spearman correlation, multiple linear regression, and LASSO regression were employed to identify predictors, with machine learning models (Random Forest) used for nonlinear exploration and validation. AIT significantly improved critical thinking disposition, with a mean total score increase of 11.813 ± 6.752 ( P = 0.001). Cognitive maturity showed the greatest improvement (3.978 ± 6.645, P = 0.004). Multiple linear regression revealed that truth-seeking (β=-1.738, P = 0.019) negatively predicted improvement, while cognitive maturity (β = 1.467, P = 0.016) positively predicted improvement. Random Forest validated these findings (AUC = 0.889). AIT effectively enhances critical thinking among dental professionals. Baseline truth-seeking and cognitive maturity are key predictors of training outcomes, informing personalized educational strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: