Benchmarking tools reveals differences in CRISPR spacer-protospacer matching for microbial studies, suggesting best practices.
Motivation CRISPR spacer-protospacer matching is widely used to infer host-virus interactions in microbial and viromics studies, but the choice of sequence search or alignment tool and its reporting behavior is often under-evaluated for this specific task. Results Using synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real datasets, we benchmarked commonly used tools and observed substantial differences in recall, runtime, and resource usage across distance metrics and thresholds. Our analyses support practical defaults for large-scale spacer-target matching and clarify trade-offs between exhaustive and heuristic approaches. Availability Source code and benchmark workflows are available at https://github.com/UriNeri/spacer_matching_bench. Data and run artifacts are archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15171878) Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: