Quantum chemistry calculations reveal solvent molecule influence on nucleophilic reactivity in reactions involving α-nucleophiles.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Under microsolvent conditions, when the α-nucleophile HOO – reacts with CH 3 Br, it can abstract a proton from the solvent CH 3 OH to induce alternative nucleophile CH 3 O – (HOOH). In the present work, the competition between the normal HOO – –S N 2 pathway and the photon transfer (PT)-induced CH 3 O – –S N 2 pathway has been explored by quantum chemistry calculations for HOO – (CH 3 OH) n and CH 3 O – (HOOH) 0,1 (CH 3 OH) n −1 reacting with CH 3 Br. The potential energy profile of the HOO – –S N 2 pathway exhibits that the energy barriers of the traditional back-side attack substitution are 0.4–3.8 kcal/mol lower than those of the CH 3 O – –S N 2 pathway, suggesting the HOO – (CH 3 OH) n is more active, which is consistent with the experimental phenomenon. The activation strain analysis suggests compared to the CH 3 O – –S N 2 pathway, the stronger interaction energy between the HOO – (CH 3 OH) and CH 3 Br over the entire reaction course stabilizes its transition state, which is caused by the stronger orbital interaction of the HOO – –S N 2 pathway. The barrier heights of both pathways are increased with the incremental hydration, but the PT-induced CH 3 O – –S N 2 pathway is highly suppressed. The enhanced reactivity of reactions involving HOO – (CH 3 OH) n is found through comparison with CH 3 O – (HOOH) 0,1 (CH 3 OH) n −1 nucleophiles and is ascribed to the α-nucleophilic character of the HOO – anion. This work deepens an understanding of the nature of the α-effect nucleophile and highlights the effect of the solvent molecule on the enhanced reactivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: