Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The sealing reliability of hydrogen-cooled generator systems in nuclear power plants is directly related to unit safety and outage critical-path optimization. Conventional airtightness pressure-holding tests usually use the 24 h leakage result as the acceptance criterion, but this occupies a long maintenance window. Early pressure and temperature signals are affected by thermal equilibration, environmental disturbances, and gas–oil coupling, making direct early assessment difficult. Based on historical pressure-holding test data from multiple nuclear power plants, this study develops a short-duration auxiliary assessment method. Test records from different plants are converted into a unified equivalent leakage rate, and a standardized dataset is established. A multi-branch framework is then developed, including leakage-trend prediction, local fluctuation identification, and feature-space validation. A conservative review strategy is introduced to support safety-oriented field decision making. The validation results show that the first 12 h monitoring data can support assessment of the 24 h leakage state. No false negatives were observed within the limited validation set. Samples with inconsistent outputs, near-threshold predictions, or abnormal feature-space locations are recommended for extended pressure holding and further review.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: