Key result
Skeletal muscle mass outperforms BMI in reflecting SV and handgrip strength in Fontan patients.
Why the study?
BMI incompletely captures body composition and functional reserve in congenital heart disease, prompting evaluation of whether skeletal muscle mass relates more closely than BMI to physiologic reserve in Fontan physiology.
Does skeletal muscle mass correlate better than BMI with stroke volume, strength, and VO₂max in patients with Fontan circulation?
Cross-Sectional (n=42)
Does skeletal muscle mass correlate better than BMI with stroke volume, strength, and VO₂max in patients with Fontan circulation?
Effect estimate: r = 0.573
p-value: p=0.007
Skeletal muscle mass is a superior marker of physiologic reserve (stroke volume and strength) compared to BMI in patients with Fontan circulation.
SMM may refine functional assessment beyond BMI in Fontan patients; leaves open whether muscle-targeted strategies improve SV or VO₂max.
Body mass index (BMI) incompletely captures body composition and functional reserve in congenital heart disease. We assessed whether skeletal muscle mass (SMM) relates more closely than BMI to stroke volume (SV), strength, and peak oxygen uptake (VO₂max) in Fontan physiology versus healthy controls. Cross-sectional assessment included multifrequency bioimpedance SMM, noninvasive SV (NICaS), handgrip dynamometry, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Associations of SMM and BMI with SV, grip strength, and VO₂max were evaluated within cohorts using Pearson correlations, and impedance SMM was compared with Lee-equation SMM. Forty-two participants were studied: Fontan group ( n = 21; mean age 28.3 ± 9.7 years; 8 women) and control group ( n = 21; mean age 29.5 ± 5.9 years; 7 women). BMI was lower in the Fontan group than in the control group (24.0 ± 4.4 vs. 26.4 ± 3.4 kg/m²), as was SMM (27.8 ± 6.2 vs. 34.0 ± 7.7 kg). SMM correlated with SV in the control group ( r = 0.770, p < 0.0001) and Fontan group ( r = 0.573, p = 0.007), whereas BMI showed a weaker association in the control group ( r = 0.465, p = 0.034) and no significant association in the Fontan group ( r = 0.365, p = 0.104). SMM correlated with handgrip strength in both groups (control r = 0.754; Fontan r = 0.807), whereas BMI did not (controls r = 0.197; Fontan r = 0.242). SMM correlated with VO₂max in the control group ( r = 0.503, p = 0.020), but not in the Fontan group ( r = 0.106, p = 0.65). BMI correlated with SMM in the control group ( r = 0.448, p = 0.042), but not in the Fontan group ( r = 0.361), suggesting greater body composition heterogeneity in Fontan patients. Impedance-derived and Lee-estimated skeletal muscle mass showed strong agreement in both groups (control r = 0.903; Fontan r = 0.864). SMM outperformed BMI in reflecting SV and strength; in Fontan circulation, VO₂max appears more centrally constrained than muscle-mass limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Fontan circulation (n=42). Skeletal muscle mass vs. Body mass index was evaluated on Correlation with stroke volume in the Fontan group (r = 0.573, p=0.007). Skeletal muscle mass outperformed body mass index in reflecting stroke volume (r=0.573, p=0.007) and handgrip strength (r=0.807) in patients with Fontan circulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: