Key result
Right ventricular dysfunction management in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy lacks specific evidence, relying on left-sided guidelines.
Why the study?
Heart failure guidelines primarily focus on left ventricle function, leaving management of right ventricle dysfunction in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy lacking evidence.
Heart failure in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy requires unique management strategies, particularly adapting guideline-directed medical therapies and advanced heart failure options for predominant right ventricular dysfunction.
Clinicians should cautiously extrapolate LV HF therapies for RV dysfunction in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy; leaves open dedicated prospective trials for specific guidelines.
Improved disease recognition through family screening and increased life expectancy with appropriate sudden cardiac death prevention has increased the burden of heart failure in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). Heart failure management guidelines are well established but primarily focus on left ventricle function. A significant proportion of patients with ACM have predominant or isolated right ventricle (RV) dysfunction. Management of RV dysfunction in ACM lacks evidence but requires special considerations across the spectrum of heart failure regarding the initial diagnosis, subsequent management, monitoring for progression, and end-stage disease management. In this review, we discuss the unique aspects of heart failure management in ACM with a special focus on RV dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maniar et al. (2023) conducted a review in Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy (ACM) with Right Ventricular Dysfunction. Heart failure management strategies was evaluated. Management of right ventricular dysfunction in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy lacks specific evidence and relies largely on extrapolations from left ventricular heart failure guidelines.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: