Why the study?
Outpatient HFrEF medication management led by a pharmacist or nurse practitioner improves GDMT uptake, but its cost-effectiveness was unknown.
Does pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management improve cost-effectiveness in patients with recently diagnosed HFrEF?
Does pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management improve cost-effectiveness in patients with recently diagnosed HFrEF?
Mean Difference: 1 (95% CI 0.2–2.5)
Absolute Event Rate: 6.2% vs 7.2%
Pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management is highly cost-effective for patients with recently diagnosed HFrEF, supporting the expansion of this care model to improve GDMT uptake.
Supports adoption of pharmacist- or NP-led HFrEF medication management; extends GDMT evidence with confirmed cost-effectiveness.
BACKGROUND: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) reduces survival, increases the risk of hospitalization, and decreases quality of life. Despite high-quality evidence to support the benefits of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for patients with HFrEF, use of these medications remains suboptimal. Outpatient HFrEF medication management led by a pharmacist or nurse practitioner improves GDMT uptake, but the cost-effectiveness of such approaches is unknown. METHODS: We developed a 3-state Markov model (outpatient, hospitalized, or deceased) and compared additional pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led HFrEF medication management with usual care alone. The model simulated a cohort of patients recently diagnosed with HFrEF within British Columbia, Canada. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), costs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and net monetary benefit (NMB) at a willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD$50,000 per QALY, over a lifetime horizon from a public payer perspective. RESULTS: Pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management reduced deaths (from 7.2 to 6.2 per 100 patients; mean difference, 1.0; 95% credible interval, 0.2-2.5) and heart failure hospitalizations (from 10.8 to 8.4 per 100 patients; mean difference, 2.4; 95% credible interval, 0.7-5.2) at 1 year compared with usual care. Pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management increased both QALYs (+1.76) and costs (+CAD$13,089), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD$7437 per QALY and an incremental NMB of CAD$75,032. These results were robust across 1-way sensitivity analyses (incremental NMB ≥ CAD$46,611). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with recently diagnosed HFrEF, pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management is cost-effective, supporting the expansion of this care to improve GDMT uptake and patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MacDonald et al. (2026) studied Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management vs. Usual care alone was evaluated on Deaths at 1 year (MD 1.0, 95% CI 0.2-2.5). Pharmacist- and/or nurse practitioner-led medication management reduced deaths at 1 year (6.2 vs 7.2 per 100 patients) and was cost-effective with an ICER of CAD$7437 per QALY.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: