Examines NLP's impact on coherence and cohesion in college writing, implying pedagogical benefits.
We investigated how the natural language processing (NLP) model enhances coherence and cohesion in college-level writing through cross-lingual computational analysis.Conventional automated writing evaluation systems emphasize surface-level grammar while neglecting structural discourse patterns.Therefore, we developed a unified transformer-based pipeline employing paraphrase-multilingual-MiniLM-L12-v2, which generates dense vector embeddings to compute semantic similarity matrices and trace discourse trajectories across English and Chinese essays.Quantitative profiles were validated through structured student and instructor interviews, forming a mixed-methods framework that integrates algorithmic metrics.The results showed substantial improvements, a 34.10% increase in local coherence, an 18.37% rise in global thematic alignment, and a 56.45% reduction in redundant sentence components, indicating enhanced semantic density and structural consistency.Improvements in embedding distributions corresponded with cognitive interventions observed during interviews, confirming the pedagogical relevance of NLP-driven feedback.In further studies, keystroke and behavioral metrics must be integrated to enrich multimodal evaluation, and open-domain text styles and diverse populations need to be included to validate and refine discourse architecture through advanced NLP modeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qiuyun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: