Foundation time-series models like Sundial achieved the lowest overall mean absolute error (6.06 mg/dL) for 30-minute ahead glucose prediction, though performance varied at the patient level.
Do foundation time-series models improve 30 min ahead glucose prediction compared to classical forecasting methods in adults with T1DM?
Foundation time-series models like Sundial offer strong global performance for short-term CGM forecasting, but patient-specific model selection is still required.
Foundation time-series models have recently shown potential for forecasting complex temporal signals, but their behavior in patient-specific continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) forecasting remains insufficiently understood, particularly when only glucose history is available. This study provides a patient-level benchmark of foundation models for 30 min ahead glucose prediction in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) under a strictly univariate CGM-only setting. Using the HUPA–UCM dataset from 25 individuals, we evaluated TimeGPT, Chronos, and Sundial against representative statistical, machine learning, and deep learning forecasters, including ARIMA, ETS, gradient-boosting models, recurrent networks, and neural forecasting architectures. Models were assessed using a local walk-forward validation strategy over the final 24 h of CGM data for each patient. Foundation models achieved the strongest global performance, with Sundial obtaining the lowest overall MAE (6.06mg/dL), while TimeGPT and Chronos remained among the most competitive approaches. However, patient-level analyses showed that this advantage was not uniform: ARIMA remained highly competitive in selected individuals, and no single model consistently dominated across the cohort. These findings suggest that foundation time-series models are promising tools for short-horizon CGM forecasting, but their use should be framed within patient-specific model selection rather than as universal replacements for classical forecasting methods.
Diaz-Velazco et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Type 1 diabetes mellitus (n=25). Foundation time-series models (TimeGPT, Chronos, Sundial) vs. Statistical, machine learning, and deep learning forecasters (e.g., ARIMA, ETS) was evaluated on 30 min ahead glucose prediction (overall Mean Absolute Error). Foundation time-series models like Sundial achieved the lowest overall mean absolute error (6.06 mg/dL) for 30-minute ahead glucose prediction, though performance varied at the patient level.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: