Evaluates follow-up effectiveness in early breast cancer, suggesting personalized surveillance strategies.
The follow up in early breast cancer represented a major challenging in oncology practice. Current guidelines are supported by evidence demonstrating no benefit of intensive surveillance.Despite evidence, many oncologists still practice a more intensive follow-up, prompting studies to evaluate and improve real-world effectiveness: the effectiveness of routine screening is further questioned by the varied relapse patterns across breast cancer subtypes. Rethinking surveillance as a calibrated clinical choice, rather than an automatic procedure, is a scientific and civic duty in the era of personalized and sustainable healthcare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Angiolini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: