Key result
Enfortumab vedotin linked to acute cardiac tamponade requiring ~2400 mL drainage before safe therapy resumption.
Why the study?
Cardiac adverse events such as pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade associated with enfortumab vedotin are extremely rare.
Case Report (n=1)
Enfortumab vedotin can cause rare, acute inflammatory pericardial effusion and tamponade, which can be successfully managed with surgical drainage to allow safe resumption of cancer therapy.
May warrant vigilance for tamponade with enfortumab vedotin; leaves open true incidence and mechanisms.
Introduction Enfortumab vedotin is a Nectin‐4‐directed antibody–drug conjugate approved for metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Cardiac adverse events such as pericardial effusion or tamponade associated with enfortumab vedotin are extremely rare. Case Presentation A 50‐year‐old man with metastatic UC developed chest pain and dyspnea 3 days after the first EV infusion, followed by rapid progression to cardiac tamponade on Day 9. Emergency pericardiocentesis and thoracoscopic pericardial fenestration drained 2400 mL of pericardial and pleural fluid. Pericardial cytology revealed inflammatory cells without malignancy, while pleural nodules confirmed urothelial carcinoma. Infectious causes were excluded, and an acute EV‐related inflammatory reaction was suspected. EV was safely resumed on postoperative Day 20, achieving a sustained partial response for 8 months without recurrence of pericardial effusion. Conclusion This rare case highlights the potential for acute, enfortumab vedotin‐related inflammatory pericardial effusion and emphasizes the importance of early recognition and prompt surgical intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akamatsu et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Metastatic urothelial carcinoma (n=1). Enfortumab vedotin was evaluated. Enfortumab vedotin initiation was associated with acute cardiac tamponade requiring drainage of 2400 mL of fluid, followed by safe resumption of therapy and an 8-month partial response.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: