Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exploratory study operationalises historical literacy CDFs, revealing alignment issues in students’ texts.
This paper aims to operationalise History literacy descriptors at CEFR B1 and B2 levels, using student-written texts from an EMI Ancient History course in Spain. The objective is threefold: (1) to identify the range and frequency of CDFs in students’ writing, (2) to explore whether and how disciplinary expertise shapes interpretation of CDF descriptors and language-for-CDF descriptors in the coding process, and (3) to identify areas in the CDF and language-for-CDF descriptors that require refinement. Texts were independently coded at the macro/micro levels by the team of researchers, using the descriptors for content and academic language, followed by analytical discussions to identify the most used CDFs and to establish coder-coder intersubjectivity. Findings reveal that CDFs differed depending on the students’ English proficiency levels and historical understanding, with CDF_Evaluate and CDF_Explore appearing more frequently at B2 level. The experts’ discussions highlighted the complexity of finding common ground when coding and helped co-construct intersubjectivity through the negotiation of the shared understanding. Although the study supports the viability of CDF-aligned descriptors, the analysis revealed incongruencies in coding of the historical content and the linguistic realisations, identifying the need to better align the CDF and language-for-CDF descriptors and suggesting refinements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evnitskaya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: