Model analyzes how interest-growth rate dynamics shape capital allocation and economic outcomes, suggesting implications for fiscal strategy.
We challenge a recently popular view that a negative interest-growth rate gap ( r < g ) offers a “free lunch” for debt-financed government spending by formulating a model in which r and g are endogenous variables shaped by fiscal policy through its effects on equilibrium multiplicity and capital allocation. Observing r < g can signal that sustained government deficits have generated multiple steady states, and the economy has converged to a stable low-efficiency equilibrium. With its heterogeneous entrepreneurs, the model’s real interest rate serves as a screening device for investment efficiency. Causation runs from the fiscal regime to equilibrium selection and outcomes: Fiscal surpluses eliminate equilibrium multiplicity and anchor expectations that sustain a unique, high-productivity equilibrium, thereby rationalizing Alexander Hamilton’s characterization of “debt as a blessing.” Persistent deficits can push the economy into a “misallocation trap” characterized by scarce safe assets, low interest rates, survival of inefficient firms, depressed aggregate productivity, and self-validating low growth. Thus, costs of debt-financed fiscal deficits consist not only of deferred taxes, but also of permanently lower national productive capacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: