Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective paired study finds superior image quality in mobile CT versus stationary CT in ICU patients, indicating potential for wider use.
INTRODUCTION: We compared image quality of first- and second generation SOMATOM On.site mobile head CT with vendor-matched stationary head CT in neurosurgical ICU patients. METHODS: Retrospective paired study of 100 ICU patients, 50 mobile CT v1 and 50 mobile CT v2, paired with stationary CT, yielding 200 head CT exams. Four radiologists blinded to image characteristics scored five tasks on a four-point scale: supratentorial cortical and deep image quality, infratentorial image quality and artifact severity. Quantitative metrics were attenuation and noise from four standardized ROIs, and grey-white matter contrast-to-noise ratio. RESULTS: MobCT v2 received higher reader scores than paired stationary CT for overall image quality, supratentorial cortical and deep image quality, and equal to stationary CT for infratentorial image quality and artifact severity. Mobile CT v1 was rated lower than paired stationary CT, and lower than mobile CT v2, for all tasks. Attenuation, noise, and CNR were similar across groups. Radiation dose favoured mobile CT v2 with a median Dose Length Product (DLP) of 39.6 mGy·cm compared to 50.1 mGy·cm for mobile CTv1. CONCLUSION: The second generation On.site mobile CT yielded superior image quality versus the first generation and comparable to contemporary stationary CT with similar quantitative metrics. These findings support a broader adoption of point-of-care head CT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: