This randomized trial demonstrates a new method to improve quantum process tomography efficiency, implying significant advancements in quantum hardware scalability.
Quantum process tomography (QPT) is now the central scaling bottleneck in quantum hardware development. Standard QPT requires O(d⁴ⁿ) measurements for an n-qubit system, making full characterisation beyond 2–3 qubits experimentally infeasible with existing methods. As hardware scales toward and beyond the 105-qubit Willow generation, this bottleneck becomes the defining engineering problem. This paper develops a spectral arithmetic approach to process tomography that breaks the exponential barrier by construction. Rather than estimating a dense Liouville superoperator, a physical error channel is assigned a fixed generator Ω and the noisy gate is tracked on the invariant arithmetic orbit G(α) = exp(αΩ)G₀. The calibration variable is the scalar α, not a d² × d² matrix. Broadband drift is decomposed into orthogonal spectral channels, each evolved by a scalar recursion and stored by Hilbert-space projection. The paper proves: one-dimensional tangent structure; exact composition when [Ω,G₀]=0; BCH-controlled non-commuting residuals (detecting non-Markovian noise without expanding the dense state); gauge-coordinate invariance; covariance separation under orthogonal projections; scalar boundedness; Parseval information conservation; KMS thermal equilibrium of the scalar Kalman filter; and explicit complexity reduction from O(q²d⁸) to O(MK) memory. Connections to the Spectral Computing Programme are established throughout: the arithmetic orbit is the engineering instantiation of the Arithmetic Cylinder; BCH residuals are the Defect Operator Ξ; the physical concentration metric C_phys is the non-birefringence condition of the arithmetic vacuum; and the Kalman steady state is the thermodynamic phase transition at σ = ½. The engineering claim is accepted only where the corresponding calculation is shown. All remaining empirical tasks are explicitly identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timothy Desmond (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: