Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comment highlights the need for psychology curricula to enhance AI proficiency among graduates, which could strengthen interdisciplinary contributions.
Robinson et al. propose embedding AI proficiency into psychology curricula, mapping it onto established educational guidelines. This comment argues that the proposition could reach further and be more ambitious. I contend that psychology should prepare graduates not only as competent users of AI, but as active contributors to its design, evaluation, and governance. I emphasize three domains where psychology graduates who combine psychology proficiency and AI proficiency can make distinctive, interdisciplinary contributions: evaluating AI systems, designing human–AI interaction, and shaping AI governance and policy. Taking such an ambitious perspective will strengthen psychology's role in realizing human-centered AI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Markus Langer (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: