Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates enhanced methane production from waste activated sludge and food waste, highlighting the need for process stability.
In this study, the integration of enzymatic pretreatment with anaerobic co-digestion (ACoD) was evaluated as a strategy to enhance methane production from waste activated sludge (WAS) and food waste (FW). Hydrolytic enzymes were produced via solid-state fermentation (SSF) using Aspergillus niger and babassu cake as substrate, resulting in a crude enzyme extract with high xylanase and protease activities, indicating strong hydrolytic potential for sludge pretreatment, along with lower activities of amylase and endoglucanase. Enzymatic pretreatment of WAS at 0.2 U/mg total suspended solids promoted up to 95% organic matter solubilization. ACoD was evaluated under three conditions: (I) FW with untreated WAS, (II) FW with enzymatically pretreated WAS, and (III) FW with WAS and direct enzyme addition. Enzymatic pretreatment increased methane yield by approximately 30%, from 210 to 270 NmL CH₄/gVS, while direct enzyme addition led to more moderate improvements. Kinetic modeling using modified Gompertz and logistic models confirmed enhanced methane production but indicated longer lag phases in enzyme-treated systems, attributed to intermediate product accumulation. Under these conditions, elevated volatile acidity/total alkalinity ratios and increased ammonia concentrations suggested process stress. Overall, SSF-derived enzymes combined with co-digestion represent a promising strategy to boost methane production, while requiring careful control to avoid acidification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendonça et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: