Key result
Initiating spironolactone with sacubitril/valsartan is linked to ~26% lower severe hyperkalemia risk versus RASi.
Why the study?
To compare the real-world risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure initiating spironolactone while receiving sacubitril/valsartan versus a RASi in a heterogeneous population.
Does initiating spironolactone while on sacubitril/valsartan reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure compared to initiating while on ACEi/ARB?
Cohort (n=57,926)
Yes
Does initiating spironolactone while on sacubitril/valsartan reduce the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure compared to initiating while on ACEi/ARB?
Initiating spironolactone in heart failure patients already on sacubitril/valsartan is associated with a lower risk of severe hyperkalemia compared to those on ACEi/ARB therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spironolactone with sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower severe hyperkalemia risk than with RASi; leaves open need for randomized trials before practice change.
We aimed to compare the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with heart failure initiating spironolactone while receiving sacubitril/valsartan vs. those initiating while on a RASi in a real-world clinical setting among a heterogeneous population. We conducted a new-user, active comparator cohort study of patients with heart failure initiating spironolactone from April 1, 2016, to July 31, 2024, using a large national commercial insurance database. Patients were classified as RASi users (continuous ACEi/ARB use ≥30 days prior to and including spironolactone initiation) or ARNI users (continuous sacubitril/valsartan use over the same period). Propensity score based fine-stratification weighting was used for confounding control. Outcomes included hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L) and severe hyperkalemia (>6 mmol/L), assessed over a maximum follow-up of 180 days. About 57,926 patients initiated spironolactone: 8,589 while on ARNI (mean age: 70.6 years, 39.5% female) and 49,337 while on RASi (mean age: 72.8 years, 48.6% female). Incidence rates (95% confidence intervals) for hyperkalemia were lower among ARNI users (9.44 (8.46, 10.51) vs. 12.55 (12.07, 13.04) per 100 person-years), corresponding to a weighted rate difference of -1.20 (-1.74, -0.60) events per 100 person-years. Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were 0.89 (0.79-1.01) for hyperkalemia and 0.74 (0.57-0.95) for severe hyperkalemia. Findings were consistent across subgroups. Initiation of spironolactone among patients with heart failure receiving sacubitril/valsartan was associated with a lower risk of severe hyperkalemia, compared with RASi use. This study expands upon previous findings suggesting the risk of hyperkalemia when using MRAs may be mitigated through the substitution of sacubitril/valsartan for RASi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crum et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=57,926). Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) vs. Renin-Angiotensin System inhibitors (RASi) was evaluated on Hyperkalemia (serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L) (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.79-1.01). Initiating spironolactone with sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure patients was associated with a lower risk of severe hyperkalemia compared to RASi use (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57-0.95).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: