Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis explores posthumanism and critiques anthropocentrism in Pillai's novel, highlighting animal agency.
Deconstructing Anthropocentrism: A Posthumanist Analysis of M. P. Narayana Pillai's ParinaamamAyisha HaneefThis paper examines M. P. Narayana Pillai's novel Parinamam through a posthumanist analytical framework, arguing that the work is a pioneering example of posthumanistic literature that critiques anthropocentrism and challenges the human-animal binary. While Pillai is often categorised as a modernist writer, this study demonstrates that his focus on the alienated lives of both humans and non-humans, particularly in Parinaamam, reveals a deeper engagement with posthumanist perspectives. The novel's protagonist, a dog named Tommy, is presented not as a symbolic animal but as a complex subject with his own ideology and revolutionary consciousness. By giving voice and agency to a non-human, Pillai critiques human-centric institutions—from the state to political ideologies—and exposes their hypocrisies. The paper employs an analytical method to explore how Pillai's narrative blurs the lines of anthropomorphism and zoomorphism, ultimately envisioning a ‘zoopolis’ where animals are regarded as co-beings with inherent political and moral rights. In conclusion, this paper asserts that Parinaamam is a seminal work that anticipates contemporary posthumanist thought by decentering the human and asking fundamental questions about our relationship with other species.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayisha Haneef (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: