Key result
Multimodal imaging, including transesophageal echocardiography, coronary cineangiography, and computed tomography, successfully facilitated the accurate anatomical diagnosis of giant coronary artery fistulas in two patients.
Why the study?
Coronary artery fistulas are rare and often difficult to diagnose, and while invasive coronary angiography is the gold standard, non-invasive multimodal imaging modalities are needed to improve diagnostic accuracy and planning.
Case Report (n=2)
Multimodal imaging is valuable for diagnosing and predicting the disease course in patients with giant coronary artery fistulas, though invasive cineangiography remains necessary.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports multimodal imaging for giant CAF evaluation; leaves open need for prospective validation before broader adoption.
Being a very rare cardiac disease, most cases of coronary artery fistula (CAF) are genetic. Complications such as coronary steal syndrome, myocardial infarction, heart failure, or tamponade can manifest following the abnormal communication that the fistula creates between the coronary arteries and cardiac chambers or major vessels and the subsequent shunt. Most CAFs are small and asymptomatic, making diagnosis difficult. In symptomatic patients, the initial diagnostic workup is generally made with chest radiography and electrocardiography. Other imaging modalities have also been suggested to improve diagnostic accuracy. Cardiac catheterization and coronary angiography are currently the gold standard for diagnosis and planning the intervention, as they can recognize the quantum of the shunt as well as complications of a fistulous track (e.g., aneurysm formation, thrombus, leak, and the number of openings to the receiving chamber/vessel); however, this invasive method may be associated with risk. Herein, we report two patients with giant CAFs, one from the left circumflex artery to the coronary sinus and the other to the superior vena cava. Moreover, we describe how multimodal imaging, including two- and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, coronary cineangiography, coronary computed tomography angiography, and enhanced chest computed tomography, can facilitate diagnosis and estimate the disease course in such patients. We believe that using multimodal imaging cannot only help the initial diagnosis regarding the presence of a CAF and the accurate anatomical site of the fistula in the patient but can also help predict the disease course and choose the most suitable treatment modality. Therefore, we suggest multimodal imaging be done to diagnose patients suspected of CAF. However, invasive cineangiography should be necessarily followed, regardless of whether an intervention is planned or not.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sharifkazemi et al. (2022) conducted a case report in Giant coronary artery fistula (n=2). Multimodal imaging was evaluated on Accurate anatomical diagnosis of coronary artery fistula. Multimodal imaging, including transesophageal echocardiography, coronary cineangiography, and computed tomography, successfully facilitated the accurate anatomical diagnosis of giant coronary artery fistulas in two patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: