Key result
Edwards-Sapien PPVR in native RVOT shows similar mid-term major event rates versus non-native tracts.
Why the study?
Information on mid-term outcomes of percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement with the Edwards Sapien valve in the native right ventricular outflow tract is limited.
Does percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement with Edwards-Sapien bioprosthesis yield similar mid-term outcomes in native versus non-native right ventricular outflow tracts?
Cohort (n=76)
No
Does percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement with Edwards-Sapien bioprosthesis yield similar mid-term outcomes in native versus non-native right ventricular outflow tracts?
Absolute Event Rate: 87.1% vs 93.1%
p-value: p=0.875
Percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement with the Edwards-Sapien valve demonstrates satisfactory and comparable mid-term outcomes in both native and non-native right ventricular outflow tracts.
Comparable mid-term outcomes may support expanded Sapien PPVR consideration in native RVOTs; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Information on mid-term outcomes of percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement (PPVR) with the Edwards Sapien (ES) valve in the native right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) are limited. This study assesses mid-term outcomes in 76 patients who underwent PPVR between 2016 and 2022, comparing native (40.8%) and non-native (59.2%) RVOTs. The primary endpoint was a composite of endocarditis, reinterventions, and cardiovascular death and secondary outcomes included prosthetic valve dysfunction (PVD), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and indexed ventricular volumes. The median patient age was 23.9 years. Pulmonary regurgitation was predominant in the native RVOT group (67.7%), while pulmonary stenosis or combined lesions were more common in the non-native group (90.9%). Procedural success was 98.7%. After a median follow-up of 3.3 years, there was no significant difference in freedom from the primary outcome between groups (87.1% native vs. 93.1% non-native, p = 0.875). Endocarditis and reinterventions occurred at 1.2 per 100 patient-years, and PVD at 3.19 per 100 patient-years, with no differences between groups. A 1-year reduction in ventricular volumes and TR was seen only in the non-native group, with no improvement in RVEF. Overall, PPVR with the ES valve demonstrates satisfactory mid-term outcomes in both native and non-native RVOTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Belahnech et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction (n=76). Percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement in native RVOT vs. Percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement in non-native RVOT was evaluated on Composite of endocarditis, reinterventions, and cardiovascular death (freedom from event) (p=0.875). Percutaneous pulmonary valve replacement with the Edwards-Sapien valve in native right ventricular outflow tracts demonstrated similar mid-term freedom from endocarditis, reintervention, and cardiovascular death compared to non-native tracts (87.1% vs 93.1%, p=0.875).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: