Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The interpretation of persistent IDH1/2 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains a matter of debate, particularly in the context of measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. While IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are well-established therapeutic targets and are readily trackable with high analytical sensitivity, their biological position within clonal hierarchies raises uncertainty about whether their persistence reflects residual leukemia or survival of pre-leukemic clones [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. This distinction has direct clinical implications, as misclassification of IDH1/2 persistence may lead to inappropriate therapeutic escalation or misinterpretation of remission depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marconi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: