Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows altered product selectivity during CO2 electroreduction in Cu nanoclusters, suggesting a new tuning method.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Atomically precise thiolate-protected Cu nanoclusters (NCs) typically suffer from an intrinsic bias toward the two-electron formate pathway in CO 2 electroreduction, limiting access to more deeply reduced products. Breaking this selectivity within a structurally well-defined system remains a significant challenge due to the difficulty of precisely tuning the Cu valence states. Here, we address this limitation through atomic-level valence-state engineering by introducing [S@Cu 50 S 12 (S t Bu) 20 (CF 3 COO) 12 ] (S@Cu 50 ) NC, featuring a controlled Cu(I)/Cu(II) ratio within a conserved structural framework. Single-crystal analysis reveals a core–shell S@Cu 14 S 12 @Cu 36 architecture, while XPS confirms an increased Cu(II) population compared to the reference [Cu 50 S 12 (S t Bu) 20 (CF 3 COO) 12 ] (Cu 50 ) analogue. Despite similar overall catalytic activity, S@Cu 50 exhibits a striking shift in product selectivity during CO 2 electroreduction, suppressing formate formation (Faradaic efficiency of <11% vs 38% in Cu 50 ) and enabling CH 3 OH production with a Faradaic efficiency of ∼19% at –1.0 V vs RHE─absent in the Cu 50 system. Density functional theory calculations attribute this mechanistic switching to valence-induced electronic modulation, which stabilizes CO-derived intermediates and promotes sequential hydrogenation toward CH 3 OH, in contrast to HCOO stabilization in the reference NC. This work establishes that subtle modulation of the Cu(I)/Cu(II) balance can fundamentally redirect reaction pathways, providing a molecular-level strategy to overcome intrinsic selectivity limitations in Cu NC catalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: