Biomarker-stratified phase II trials need to efficiently identify treatment activity in heterogeneous subpopulations while maintaining rigorous multiplicity control. Conventional approaches, such as parallel Simon two-stage designs, are often inefficient and provide limited guidance on balancing pooled and subgroup-specific efficacy claims under regulatory constraints. We propose a Biomarker-guided Optimized Outcome Simon Two-stage (BOOST) design, which extends the classical Simon framework to adaptive, biomarker-stratified settings. BOOST incorporates explicit stage one futility rules, adaptive enrichment toward promising subgroups, and a unified final-stage decision logic accommodating pooled and subgroup-specific efficacy claims. The design is formulated within a constrained optimization framework that minimizes expected sample size subject to prespecified power and family-wise error rate (FWER) constraints under either weak or strong control. Importantly, the definitions of Type I error rate and power are explicitly aligned with the operational decision rules of the design. Simulation studies demonstrate that BOOST achieves desired Type I error rate control and target power while reducing expected sample size compared with parallel Simon two-stage designs and existing adaptive approaches. Efficiency gains are most pronounced in settings with heterogeneous biomarker-defined treatment effects, with reductions in expected sample size and minimal additional cost when strengthening from weak to strong FWER control.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
童鹤龄 et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: