Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective trial assesses fungal infection outcomes in children after stem cell transplant, indicating the need for tailored strategies.
The optimal strategy to prevent and treat invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in children receiving allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is not well established. A paediatric bone marrow transplant (BMT) working group set up UK national guidelines for the management of IFI and conducted a prospective study to assess the impact of these on incidence and outcomes. From March 2017 to December 2021, 358 children who received HSCT were prospectively included. Most children (82%) received either itraconazole (41%) or liposomal amphotericin B (41%) prophylaxis with a median duration of 170 days (interquartile range [IQR] 101-279). Cumulative incidence of possible/probable/proven IFI at 1 year was 17.6%, with no significant differences in children receiving itraconazole or liposomal amphotericin B (15.7% vs. 15.9%, 0.997). In multivariate analysis models (Fine-Gray hazard ratio) underlying malignant disease and low azoles therapeutic drug monitoring levels were independently associated with development of IFI. Children with probable/proven IFI had a higher 1-year transplant-related mortality (22% vs. 5.7%, Gray's test, p < 0.001). By adopting standardized anti-fungal prophylaxis, the incidence of proven/probable IFI in a large cohort of transplanted children was 5% and these showed significant decreased survival, warranting tailored prophylactic strategies in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ottaviano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: