Demonstrates enhanced pain assessment in tele-rehabilitation, indicating a privacy-preserving solution.
Remote tele-rehabilitation requires objective pain assessment, but existing approaches fail in two distinct ways. Self-report scales such as the Visual Analog Scale and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale are easy to falsify, opening a special case of the Oracle problem in blockchain-based insurance. Cloud-based computer vision handles falsification but transmits raw biometric video off the patient’s device, violating privacy requirements. A decentralized Edge AI-Oracle architecture is proposed that combines MediaPipe Face Mesh landmark extraction with a recurrent classifier mapping Action-Unit feature sequences to a learned pain score aligned with the Prkachin and Solomon Pain Intensity scale. The recurrent cell is selected empirically across short-context (T = 2) and long-context (T = 120 frames at 24 fps) regimes, with a two-layer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network adopted for deployment. Inference and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA) signing run inside an ARM TrustZone Trusted Execution Environment (TEE). Biometric logs are stored off-chain on the InterPlanetary File System (IPFS). Smart contracts anchor results on-chain and open a 24 h optimistic verification window for an off-chain Watchtower auditor. On SynPAIN the LSTM reaches F1 = 0.683 on T = 120 video (leave-one-stratum-out), with a directional but non-significant advantage over Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) (Wilcoxon p = 0.167). Cross-dataset validation on BioVid Heat Pain Database Part A (87 subjects, 174 paired observations, leave-one-subject-out) yields F1 = 0.519 for LSTM and 0.499 for GRU (Wilcoxon p = 0.549). A processor-only TEE surrogate benchmark estimates 1.96 ms (FP32) and 0.45 ms (INT8) inference latency at T = 120 with a 0.34 MB footprint and 707 µs ECDSA signing latency, leaving the INT8 inference latency more than an order of magnitude below the 33 ms per-frame budget. The dual-layer storage reduces gas costs by a factor of 23.4 (160,261 vs. 3,744,872 gas), corresponding to an illustrative mainnet cost of approximately 0.53 USD per submission at 1 gwei, rising to roughly 16 USD at a busier 30 gwei, and falling to approximately 0.005 USD on Arbitrum One (April 2026 reference parameters), so that continuous monitoring is economically practical on Layer-2. An adaptive-adversary analysis of the Watchtower shows that gross score tampering is detected at every usable operating threshold, whereas a rational adversary who inflates by less than the dispute threshold, or who shapes the injected score to fall just inside it, evades detection. Because the false-positive rate reaches zero only for δ≳0.15, the protocol bounds rather than eliminates patient-side fraud and motivates a zero-knowledge proof-of-inference successor. The framework is architecturally and economically feasible as a cryptographically verifiable, privacy-preserving tele-rehabilitation substrate aligned with General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) requirements through the Zero-Video Transmission principle, while remaining economically viable under post-Dencun mainnet and Layer-2 conditions. Recognition accuracy on real-world data and robustness to small-magnitude tampering remain limitations that the interchangeable recognition and audit components must improve before clinical deployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilous et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: