Computational analysis evaluates the structure-property relationship of ethyl 4-aminobenzoate, aiding drug development.
Benzocaine (BZC; ethyl 4-aminobenzoate) is an ester local anesthetic, but its spectroscopic signatures, solvent-dependent electronic response, local reactivity, and drug-likeness have rarely been unified in a molecular framework. We optimized BZC using density functional theory at the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level and performed vibrational, Raman, time-dependent density functional theory ultraviolet–visible, frontier-orbital, global/local reactivity, density of states, molecular electrostatic potential, reduced density gradient, electron localization function, localized orbital locator, thermodynamic, and SwissADME analyses. The solvent effects in water, ethanol, and acetonitrile were treated using the polarizable continuum model of the integral equation formalism. Benchmarking calculated Fourier-transform infrared frequencies against reported experimental bands yielded a mean absolute error of 35.21 \(cm⁻¹\) , root mean square error of 53.03 \(cm⁻¹\) , mean absolute percentage error of 1.56%, and coefficient of determination of 0.9992. Diagnostic bands include ester C=O stretching at 1749.55 \(cm⁻¹\) , coupled C–C/C–O stretching at 1284.96 \(cm⁻¹\) , N–H stretching at 3629.10 \(cm⁻¹\) , and C–H stretching at 3160.41 \(cm⁻¹\) . The longest-wavelength gas-phase transition appears at 268.30 nm, with a brighter nearby transition at 267.19 nm; solvent calculations shift the main band to 281.40-−281.53 nm and increase oscillator strength. This indicates solvent-stabilized \(π → π *\) excitation. Polar media narrow the frontier orbital gap and increase electrophilicity, whereas electrostatic and Fukui analyses identify the carbonyl oxygen, amino group, and aromatic framework as key interaction/reactivity regions. This study provides a consolidated computational reference for interpreting BZC structure–property behavior and guiding derivative, formulation, and spectroscopic studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Neupane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: