PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 3, 2026PeerJ0 citationsOpen Access

A retrospective study of differential prognostic factors in early-onset versus late-onset colorectal cancer: a comprehensive clinical and machine learning analysis

View Full Paper
LHLifang HuangNanfang HospitalRZRuntao ZhongNanfang HospitalKLKangkang LiHubei University

Key Points

  • This study compares clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer.
  • Retrospective analysis of 1,148 colorectal cancer patients, categorized into early-onset (247) and late-onset (901) groups.
  • Clinical comparisons made using Mann–Whitney U test and Chi-square test.
  • Prognostic factors identified using LASSO Cox regression and validated with a random survival forest model.
  • EO-CRC patients had significant predictors such as distant metastasis, family history, and PD-L1 expression >10%.
  • LO-CRC patients showed associations with age, BRAF V600E mutation, and elevated CA19-9 levels.
  • C-index values were 0.829 for EO-CRC and 0.751 for LO-CRC, indicating strong predictive performance.

Abstract

Background The incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC; age 10%, whereas LO-CRC patients exhibited higher rates of hypertension, diabetes, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Although OS did not differ significantly between groups ( P = 0.460), their prognostic determinants varied markedly. In EO-CRC, distant metastasis, family history, Tumor, Node, and Metastasis (TNM) stage, PMS1 homolog 2, mismatch repair system component (PMS2), MutS Homolog 6 (MSH6), tumor size, concurrent polyps, and Ki-67 were major predictors. In LO-CRC, age, BRAF gene V600E mutation (BRAF V600E) mutation, elevated Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), Ki-67, low hemoglobin, vascular invasion, MutL Homolog 1 (MLH1), and pathological type were significant contributors. The C-index values for the EO-CRC and LO-CRC models were 0.829 (SE = 0.023) and 0.751 (SE = 0.018), respectively, and all time-dependent ROC curves demonstrated Area Under the Curve (AUCs) above 0.70, indicating good predictive performance. RSF analyses further confirmed that distant metastasis and family history as the strongest predictors, while age and BRAF V600E are the strongest predictors for LO-CRC. Conclusion This study suggests that EO-CRC and LO-CRC have fundamentally different prognostic determinants: the former emphasizes genetic susceptibility and tumor invasiveness, indicating that this group of patients may benefit from early genetic counseling, MMR/MSI testing, and immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. The latter highlights age, acquired molecular changes, and chronic systemic factors, supporting the inclusion of metabolic and geriatric assessments in routine tumor care.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a4752405c29257aa2578ff6https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21484
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper