Experimental study investigates porous tip treatments to reduce noise in aviation applications, suggesting effective strategies for noise reduction.
Improving the understanding and control of tip leakage noise is increasingly important for meeting future aviation noise-reductions targets. This study experimentally investigates porous tip treatments on a single stationary aerofoil, focusing on their effect on the two tip leakage noise sources, vortex-shedding and shear layer roll-up, both arising from the tip flow separation at the pressure side tip. Porous tip effectively reduces the roll-up noise source, with even a thin treatment of 1.6 mm providing reductions of almost 10 dB, whereas vortex-shedding noise radiation shifts toward lower frequencies and achieves almost full suppression for the thickness treatment of 10 mm. Localising the porous section to the mid-chord yields comparable noise reductions to full-chord treatments. Aerodynamic measurements indicate a modest lift reduction with the porous treatment compared to the hard-wall case, whereas drag remains largely unaffected for larger gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saraceno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: