Randomized trial demonstrates high-precision robotic assembly in modular construction, suggesting improved efficiency through human expertise integration.
Industrialized construction imposes stringent precision requirements on the robotic assembly of modular components such as prefabricated window units. In such tolerance-critical operations, the central bottleneck is not only mechanical clearance but also the difficulty of converting tacit installer expertise into data-efficient autonomy: sparse acceptance feedback, pronounced contact variability, and millimeter-scale geometric constraints jointly constitute a formidable sample-efficiency challenge. This study presents an installer-in-the-loop interactive reinforcement learning framework that acquires such expertise through three complementary channels: offline teleoperated demonstrations, sparse event-driven binary takeovers at contact-failure boundaries, and acceptance-aligned terminal rewards, all logged under a unified schema for traceable offline-to-online adaptation. A temporally abstract action-sequence policy built on Q-chunking with Flow Q-Learning captures multimodal recovery maneuvers under sparse terminal rewards, while a non-updating warm-start phase stabilizes the offline-to-online transition. The framework is evaluated in MuJoCo across the full operational workflow, from suction acquisition through clearance-limited seating, under both structured staging and end-to-end randomized placement. Within a defined stress-test regime characterized by 2 mm per-side clearance, bounded pose perturbations, and friction randomization, the proposed pipeline attains 100% autonomous seating with 12–15 min of cumulative installer supervision over 3.0 h of online training (12 min in Experiment A; 15 min in Experiment B), and reaches the 95% success milestone in approximately 0.5 h and 1.5 h, respectively. Beyond success rate, wall-clock adaptation time, cumulative takeover minutes, intervention-rate decay, and stage-wise failure attribution are reported to inform supervision budgeting. Ablations isolate the complementary contributions of temporal abstraction, installer intervention, and warm-start value calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: