Randomized trial demonstrates improved adherence to shortened fasting protocols in cardiac patients, suggesting enhanced comfort and satisfaction.
OBJECTIVES: Recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) challenge the routine practice of keeping patients NPO ("nil per os") after midnight before diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Shorter fasting durations improve patient experience without increasing risks; however, systematic uptake into routine practice remains limited. At a high-volume cardiac care centre, patients were still being required to fast from midnight, despite emerging evidence. To assess the feasibility of shifting long‑standing practice patterns, we established a >70% adherence target for uptake of a shortened fasting protocol. METHODS: A structured quality improvement initiative using sequential Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles modified pre-procedural fasting protocols to permit a light meal up to 2 hours before cardiac catheterization and clear fluids until the procedure (i.e., intervention). Patient experience surveys were administered to intervention and control groups in 2 PDSA cycles, followed by a post-implementation intervention group. The primary outcome was adherence to shortened fasting protocols (>70% target). Secondary outcomes included patient comfort, satisfaction, safety events, and sustained uptake. RESULTS: Cycle 1 included 97 outpatients (37 control, 60 intervention), cycle 2 included 84 inpatients (40 control, 44 intervention), and 45 patients were in the post-implementation group. Target adherence was met (77% in cycle 1, 82% in cycle 2, and 79% at post-implementation). Patients in the intervention groups reported lower hunger (cycle 1 outpatients) and lower nausea (cycle 2 inpatients), while satisfaction scores remained consistently high across all groups. No aspiration, intubation, or escalation to higher-level care was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Shortening fasting requirements to 2 hours before cardiac catheterization was feasible to implement in a high‑volume cardiac centre.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corovic et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: