Randomized trial shows improved hedging outcomes in stressed markets, suggesting value in model sophistication.
We study dynamic hedging in an incomplete market where the underlying asset follows a stochastic-volatility process and the hedger trades only the stock and the money-market account. The hedging problem is formulated as a multi-stage stochastic control problem with a quadratic terminal-loss objective and is solved through a Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman framework. For the Heston model, the resulting mean-variance hedge specializes to the Galtchouk–Kunita–Watanabe projection and can be written as the sum of the spot delta and a volatility-risk correction term. We emphasize that this representation is used in the paper as an implementation theorem for our setting, rather than as a new general result. On the numerical side, we compare a finite-difference alternating-direction implicit solver with a Deep Galerkin Method, providing full implementation details for both. The finite-difference solver is the preferred method for the two-state Heston problem because it is faster and more accurate on low-dimensional grids, whereas the neural solver becomes attractive only for higher-dimensional extensions where mesh-based methods become computationally burdensome. In backtests across major S&P 500 market regimes from 2006 to 2022, the stochastic-volatility-aware hedge modestly improves on Black–Scholes hedging during stress episodes, while differences are negligible in calm markets. Across the reported experiments, the PDE-optimal mean-variance hedge is numerically indistinguishable from the recalibrated Heston hedge, indicating that the main value of the framework is theoretical unification and implementation guidance rather than a materially different trading rule in the tested setting. Fixed worst-case robust hedging is overly conservative in the historical sample, although adaptive robustness remains a promising conceptual extension. The main contribution of the paper is therefore a rigorous and implementable unification of multi-stage PDE optimization with stochastic-volatility-aware hedging, together with evidence that the economic value of model sophistication is concentrated in stressed markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marozva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: