Adversarial audit tests the General Coherence Field Theory framework, revealing no formal contradictions, suggesting stricter guidance for future research.
An adversarial audit of the original General Coherence Field Theory (GCFT) framework. Rather than attempting to confirm the theory, this paper systematically tests whether later corrections, replay requirements, cosmological constraints, institutional data limitations, and post-hoc branch demotions produce a fatal contradiction. The audit concludes that while numerous claims require normalization and several branches remain open or demoted, no formal contradiction or decisive falsification of the core framework has been established. The result is a stricter, more falsifiable research program with explicit claim classes and audit boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicky Joseph Hubertus Catharina Hacquier (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: