Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates improved activity in proton exchange membrane electrolyzers, indicating potential for enhanced efficiency.
The utilization of iridium-based anode catalysts in proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers is largely limited by the presence of electrochemically inactive “dead zones” within the catalyst layer. Here, by combining in-situ visualization of gas bubble evolution with quantitative conductivity measurements and electrochemical analysis, we establish that the limited in-plane electronic conductivity, dictated by the ionomer disrupting the conductive network of IrO 2 nanocatalysts, is the dominant factor. A sequential spray-coating strategy is further developed, which decouples the deposition of a pristine conductive catalyst layer from the ionomer and thereby preserves continuous electron transport pathways. This approach effectively activates the in-plane dead zones, resulting in membrane electrode assemblies that exhibit over 30% higher activity (4.2 A cm −2 @2.0 V@80 °C; membrane: Nafion 115) than those prepared by the conventional one-step method based on IrO 2 /ionomer mixed inks. Crucially, this approach achieves both low iridium loading (0.25 mg cm –2 ) with standard catalysts and demonstrates extended stability over 8300 hours under practical current densities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: